Gossamer Gear Gorilla 50 Ultralight Backpack vs Outdoor Vitals CS40 Ultra Backpack
Why You Can Trust Us
- Side-by-side analysis based on real user feedback
- Unbiased comparisons, not influenced by partnerships
- Updated as new data becomes available
We may earn from affiliate links at no extra cost to you.
| Gorilla 50 Ultralight Backpack | CS40 Ultra Backpack | |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() VS | |
| Weight | 31.2 oz | 27 oz (size M torso with M hip belt) |
| Capacity | 50 L total; 32 L medium main body | 51 L total (S); 53 L total (M/L) |
| Fabric Type | 70D and 100D recycled Robic nylon | Challenge UltraWeave 200 UHMWPE/polyester blend |
| Hip Belt | S/M Curved (Small) M Straight (Medium/Large) | Full size fully padded load-bearing hip belt |
| Seam Sealing | No — seams are not weather-sealed | No — sewn seams are not seam-taped |
| Warranty | Lifetime | Performance Promise (see Warranty Info) |
| Fabric Denier | 70D and 100D | 200D |
| Hip Belt Size | Curved S/M: 28.5–56 in; Curved M/L: 32.5–60 in; Straight S: 26–53.5 in; M: 30–57.5 in; L: 34–61.5 in | XS: 25.5 in; S: 27.25 in; M: 30 in; L: 34 in; XL: 36.25 in (padded belt lengths) |
| Side Compression Straps | Yes | Yes — three-point side-compression cords |
| Roll Top Closure | No | Yes |
| Gossamer Gear Gorilla 50 Ultralight Backpack | Outdoor Vitals CS40 Ultra Backpack |
|---|---|
![]() | ![]() |
| Weight | |
31.2 oz | 27 oz (size M torso with M hip belt) |
| Capacity | |
50 L total; 32 L medium main body | 51 L total (S); 53 L total (M/L) |
| Fabric Type | |
70D and 100D recycled Robic nylon | Challenge UltraWeave 200 UHMWPE/polyester blend |
| Hip Belt | |
S/M Curved (Small) M Straight (Medium/Large) | Full size fully padded load-bearing hip belt |
| Seam Sealing | |
No — seams are not weather-sealed | No — sewn seams are not seam-taped |
| Warranty | |
Lifetime | Performance Promise (see Warranty Info) |
| Fabric Denier | |
70D and 100D | 200D |
| Hip Belt Size | |
Curved S/M: 28.5–56 in; Curved M/L: 32.5–60 in; Straight S: 26–53.5 in; M: 30–57.5 in; L: 34–61.5 in | XS: 25.5 in; S: 27.25 in; M: 30 in; L: 34 in; XL: 36.25 in (padded belt lengths) |
| Side Compression Straps | |
Yes | Yes — three-point side-compression cords |
| Roll Top Closure | |
No | Yes |
Durability
Gorilla 50 Ultralight Backpack
CS40 Ultra Backpack
Durability determines how well a pack survives abrasion, gear weight, and long‑term use. A more durable pack lets you push the limits without worrying about tears or broken buckles. The CS40 Ultra scores 4.4/5, buoyed by its UltraWeave 200 UHMWPE fabric, carbon‑fiber stays, and strong, sealed‑looking seams. The Gorilla 50 trails behind at 3.9/5 despite a rugged Robic nylon build, with a few complaints about wear over time. For hikers who need a pack that can take a beating, the CS40 Ultra is the clear winner.
Comfort
Gorilla 50 Ultralight Backpack
CS40 Ultra Backpack
Comfort is critical for long‑distance treks where the pack sits on you for hours. It encompasses padding, pressure distribution, and how the pack conforms to the body. The Gorilla 50 leads with a 4.8/5 rating, praised for its foam‑padded waist strap, ventilated seat pad, and overall “insanely comfortable” feel that eliminates pressure points. The CS40 Ultra, while still comfortable at 4.4/5 thanks to its carbon‑fiber frame and padded hip belt, doesn’t quite match the Gorilla’s plushness. If a pain‑free carry is your top priority, the Gorilla 50 wins.
Fit
Gorilla 50 Ultralight Backpack
CS40 Ultra Backpack
Fit covers how well a pack adapts to different body shapes and sizes, affecting stability and comfort. The Gorilla 50 earns 4.1/5 with adjustable hip belts, removable frames, and a range of curved and straight belt options that suit a wide spectrum of torso lengths. The CS40 Ultra scores 3.9/5; its ergonomic carbon‑fiber stays are praised, but reviewers note the hip belt can be short for taller users. For most hikers seeking a more universally adjustable fit, the Gorilla 50 has the edge.
Accessibility
Gorilla 50 Ultralight Backpack
CS40 Ultra Backpack
Accessibility measures how quickly you can reach gear while on the move, a factor that can save time and energy. The Gorilla 50 shines with a 4.7/5 rating, offering numerous front, side, and stretchy pockets that reviewers describe as “giant” and “easily accessible.” The CS40 Ultra, rated 4.3/5, provides useful side pockets and a front stretchy pocket, but the overall pocket count and ease‑of‑reach are lower. When rapid gear access matters, the Gorilla 50 is the superior choice.
Ventilation
Gorilla 50 Ultralight Backpack
CS40 Ultra Backpack
Ventilation affects how much heat and sweat build up against your back, especially in warm climates. Both packs are moderate, but the Gorilla 50 edges ahead with a 3.4/5 rating thanks to a ventilated seat pad and airflow‑focused padding. The CS40 Ultra’s 3.2/5 reflects a solid back panel cut that still lets sweat accumulate. While neither pack is a ventilation champion, the Gorilla 50 offers slightly better breathability for hot‑weather hikes.
Water Resistance
Gorilla 50 Ultralight Backpack
CS40 Ultra Backpack
Water resistance protects gear during rain or river crossings. The CS40 Ultra scores 4.1/5, benefitting from its ultralight waterproof fabric and positive reports of staying dry in light rain. The Gorilla 50 lags at 2.8/5, with users noting the material absorbs water and lacks full waterproofing. If you expect wet conditions, the CS40 Ultra’s superior water resistance makes it the clear winner.
Trust & Transparency
- Data-driven rankings from real user reviews
- Affiliate partnerships don't influence our methodology
We may earn commission from links.
Conclusion & Final Verdict:
Bottom Line
-
Choose the Gossamer Gear Gorilla 50 if you value supreme comfort, a plethora of easy‑access pockets, and a fit that adapts to many body types. It’s the most comfortable pack in its class, though you’ll sacrifice a few ounces of weight and water‑resistance.
-
Choose the Outdoor Vitals CS40 Ultra if you need the lightest possible pack, stronger durability, and better protection against rain. It’s marginally larger, more weather‑proof, and built with tougher fabric, making it the go‑to for weight‑critical, wet‑weather adventures.
Both packs score the same overall rating, so your decision should hinge on whether comfort or weight/durability matters more on your typical treks.
Related Comparisons
Durston Kakwa 55vsGossamer Gear Gorilla 50 Ultralight Backpack
Compare Durston Kakwa 55 vs Gossamer Gear Gorilla 50 Ultralight Backpack for this category.
Durston Kakwa 55vsOutdoor Vitals CS40 Ultra Backpack
Compare Durston Kakwa 55 vs Outdoor Vitals CS40 Ultra Backpack for this category.
Zpacks Arc Haul Ultralight BackpackvsGossamer Gear Gorilla 50 Ultralight Backpack
Compare Zpacks Arc Haul Ultralight Backpack vs Gossamer Gear Gorilla 50 Ultralight Backpack for this category.
Zpacks Arc Haul Ultralight BackpackvsOutdoor Vitals CS40 Ultra Backpack
Compare Zpacks Arc Haul Ultralight Backpack vs Outdoor Vitals CS40 Ultra Backpack for this category.

