Gregory Maven 58 Women's Backpacking Backpack vs Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack
Why You Can Trust Us
- Side-by-side analysis based on real user feedback
- Unbiased comparisons, not influenced by partnerships
- Updated as new data becomes available
We may earn from affiliate links at no extra cost to you.
| Maven 58 Women's Backpacking Backpack | Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack | |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() VS | |
| Capacity | XS/S: 54 L; S/M: 58 L | WXS/S: 62 L; WM/L: 65 L |
| Weight | XS/S: 3 lb 6.4 oz; S/M: 3 lb 8 oz | WXS/S: 4 lb 13 oz; WM/L: 4 lb 14 oz |
| Torso Adjustability | XS/S: 14–17 in; S/M: 15–19 in | WXS/S: 13–17 in; WM/L: 16–20 in |
| Hip Belt Size Range | XS/S: 24–46 in; S/M: 25–48 in | 26" – 41" |
| Hydration Compatibility | Yes | Internal hydration reservoir sleeve |
| Warranty | Limited Lifetime | All Mighty Guarantee |
| Trekking Pole Attachment | Yes | Dual ice axe loops with bungee tie-offs |
| Rain Cover Compatibility | Compatible; not included | Included raincover |
| Side Pockets | Yes | Large dual-access stretch mesh side water bottle pockets |
| Hip Pockets | Yes | Dual zippered hipbelt pockets |
| Sternum Strap | Yes | Adjustable sternum strap |
| Load Lifters | Yes | Yes; adjustable load-lifter straps |
| Sleeping Bag Compartment | Yes | Zippered sleeping bag compartment with removable divider |
| Gregory Maven 58 Women's Backpacking Backpack | Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack |
|---|---|
![]() | ![]() |
| Capacity | |
XS/S: 54 L; S/M: 58 L | WXS/S: 62 L; WM/L: 65 L |
| Weight | |
XS/S: 3 lb 6.4 oz; S/M: 3 lb 8 oz | WXS/S: 4 lb 13 oz; WM/L: 4 lb 14 oz |
| Torso Adjustability | |
XS/S: 14–17 in; S/M: 15–19 in | WXS/S: 13–17 in; WM/L: 16–20 in |
| Hip Belt Size Range | |
XS/S: 24–46 in; S/M: 25–48 in | 26" – 41" |
| Hydration Compatibility | |
Yes | Internal hydration reservoir sleeve |
| Warranty | |
Limited Lifetime | All Mighty Guarantee |
| Trekking Pole Attachment | |
Yes | Dual ice axe loops with bungee tie-offs |
| Rain Cover Compatibility | |
Compatible; not included | Included raincover |
| Side Pockets | |
Yes | Large dual-access stretch mesh side water bottle pockets |
| Hip Pockets | |
Yes | Dual zippered hipbelt pockets |
| Sternum Strap | |
Yes | Adjustable sternum strap |
| Load Lifters | |
Yes | Yes; adjustable load-lifter straps |
| Sleeping Bag Compartment | |
Yes | Zippered sleeping bag compartment with removable divider |
Comfort
Maven 58 Women's Backpacking Backpack
Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack
Comfort is crucial for backpacking packs as it directly impacts your hiking experience, especially on long trails. A comfortable pack reduces strain and fatigue, allowing you to enjoy your adventure without discomfort. The Gregory Maven 58 shines with its breathable air cushion mesh back panel and cushioned hip belt, ensuring a comfortable carry even on extended hikes. The Osprey Ariel 65, on the other hand, offers an anti-gravity suspension system and thick foam padding in the straps and hip belt, providing excellent support and comfort. Both packs excel in comfort, making it a tie as they cater to slightly different preferences in padding and suspension systems.
Fit
Maven 58 Women's Backpacking Backpack
Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack
A good fit ensures that the pack stays stable and balanced, reducing the risk of strain or injury. The Gregory Maven 58 offers an adjustable torso length and a women's specific fit, allowing for a custom fit that accommodates various body shapes. It also features a 3D cradle style hip belt that moves with your hips, providing ergonomic support. The Osprey Ariel 65 also offers a customizable fit with adjustable torso length, shoulder straps, and hip belts, but it falls slightly short in providing the same level of tailored fit as the Maven 58. Therefore, the Gregory Maven 58 is the winner in this category.
Load Transfer
Maven 58 Women's Backpacking Backpack
Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack
Effective load transfer is essential for distributing weight evenly, reducing strain on your shoulders and back. The Gregory Maven 58 excels in this area with its alloy wishbone frames and free float suspension system, which transfers the load to your legs and hips, making it feel less cumbersome. The Osprey Ariel 65 also performs well with its cushioned hip belt and adjustable straps, but it doesn't quite match the Maven 58's ability to keep the pack stable and balanced. Thus, the Gregory Maven 58 takes the lead in load transfer.
Ventilation
Maven 58 Women's Backpacking Backpack
Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack
Proper ventilation helps keep you cool and dry, which is vital for comfort during strenuous hikes. The Osprey Ariel 65 stands out with its AirScape back panel and mesh-covered foam, providing excellent airflow and breathability. The Gregory Maven 58 offers a breathable air cushion mesh back panel, but it doesn't ventilate as effectively as the Ariel 65. Therefore, the Osprey Ariel 65 is the clear winner in ventilation.
Organization
Maven 58 Women's Backpacking Backpack
Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack
Organization is key for easy access to your gear and keeping everything in its place. Both the Gregory Maven 58 and the Osprey Ariel 65 excel in this category with multiple pockets and compartments. The Maven 58 offers a removable internal divider, sleeping bag section, and numerous gear access points, making it easy to stay organized. The Ariel 65 features a detachable day pack, multiple access points, and dedicated compartments for gear, providing smart organizational features. Both packs are equally impressive in organization, resulting in a tie.
Accessibility
Maven 58 Women's Backpacking Backpack
Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack
Easy access to your essentials can save time and effort on the trail. The Osprey Ariel 65 shines with its L-shaped zipper, side pockets, and hip belt pockets, allowing quick access to snacks, water, or gear. The Gregory Maven 58 offers a large side zipper and external zipper at the bottom of the pack, but it doesn't provide the same level of accessibility as the Ariel 65. Therefore, the Osprey Ariel 65 is the winner in this category.
Trust & Transparency
- Data-driven rankings from real user reviews
- Affiliate partnerships don't influence our methodology
We may earn commission from links.
Conclusion & Final Verdict:
After a thorough comparison, the Gregory Maven 58 stands out for its superior fit and load transfer, making it an excellent choice for those prioritizing comfort and stability on long hikes. However, the Osprey Ariel 65 offers better ventilation and accessibility, ideal for those who need easy access to gear and enhanced breathability.
Choose the Gregory Maven 58 if you value a personalized fit and effective load transfer. Opt for the Osprey Ariel 65 if ventilation and quick access to your essentials are your top priorities.
Related Comparisons
Osprey Aura AG 65L Women's Backpacking BackpackvsGregory Maven 58 Women's Backpacking Backpack
Compare Osprey Aura AG 65L Women's Backpacking Backpack vs Gregory Maven 58 Women's Backpacking Backpack for this category.
Osprey Aura AG 65L Women's Backpacking BackpackvsOsprey Ariel 65 Backpack
Compare Osprey Aura AG 65L Women's Backpacking Backpack vs Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack for this category.
The North Face Women’s Terra 55 BackpackvsGregory Maven 58 Women's Backpacking Backpack
Compare The North Face Women’s Terra 55 Backpack vs Gregory Maven 58 Women's Backpacking Backpack for this category.
The North Face Women’s Terra 55 BackpackvsOsprey Ariel 65 Backpack
Compare The North Face Women’s Terra 55 Backpack vs Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack for this category.

