Osprey Aura AG 65L Women's Backpacking Backpack vs Gregory Maven 48
Why You Can Trust Us
- Side-by-side analysis based on real user feedback
- Unbiased comparisons, not influenced by partnerships
- Updated as new data becomes available
We may earn from affiliate links at no extra cost to you.
| Osprey Aura AG 65L Women's Backpacking Backpack | Maven 48 | |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() VS | |
| Capacity | WXS/S: 62 L; WM/L: 65 L | XS/S: 44 L; S/M: 48 L |
| Weight | WM/L: 4.6 lb | XS/S: 3 lb 1.9 oz; S/M: 3 lb 3.2 oz |
| Torso Adjustability | WXS/S: 13–17 in; WM/L: 16–20 in | XS/S: 14–17 in; S/M: 15–19 in |
| Hip Belt Size Range | 26–41 in | XS/S: 24–46 in; S/M: 25–48 in |
| Hydration Compatibility | Yes | Yes |
| Warranty | All Mighty Guarantee | Limited Lifetime |
| Trekking Pole Attachment | Yes | Yes |
| Rain Cover Compatibility | Included | Compatible; not included |
| Side Pockets | Yes | Yes |
| Hip Pockets | Yes | Yes |
| Sternum Strap | Yes | Yes |
| Load Lifters | Yes | Yes |
| Sleeping Bag Compartment | Yes | Yes |
| Osprey Aura AG 65L Women's Backpacking Backpack | Gregory Maven 48 |
|---|---|
![]() | ![]() |
| Capacity | |
WXS/S: 62 L; WM/L: 65 L | XS/S: 44 L; S/M: 48 L |
| Weight | |
WM/L: 4.6 lb | XS/S: 3 lb 1.9 oz; S/M: 3 lb 3.2 oz |
| Torso Adjustability | |
WXS/S: 13–17 in; WM/L: 16–20 in | XS/S: 14–17 in; S/M: 15–19 in |
| Hip Belt Size Range | |
26–41 in | XS/S: 24–46 in; S/M: 25–48 in |
| Hydration Compatibility | |
Yes | Yes |
| Warranty | |
All Mighty Guarantee | Limited Lifetime |
| Trekking Pole Attachment | |
Yes | Yes |
| Rain Cover Compatibility | |
Included | Compatible; not included |
| Side Pockets | |
Yes | Yes |
| Hip Pockets | |
Yes | Yes |
| Sternum Strap | |
Yes | Yes |
| Load Lifters | |
Yes | Yes |
| Sleeping Bag Compartment | |
Yes | Yes |
Comfort
Osprey Aura AG 65L Women's Backpacking Backpack
Maven 48
Comfort is crucial for any backpacking trip, as it directly impacts your enjoyment and endurance on the trail. A comfortable backpack ensures that you can carry your gear without unnecessary strain or discomfort, allowing you to focus on the journey rather than the weight on your back. The Gregory Maven 48 excels in this category with a score of 4.8/5, praised for its super comfortable back panel and free float suspension system, which reduces potential hot spots and blisters. The Osprey Aura AG 65L, while still comfortable with a score of 3.6/5, has some complaints about the hip belt causing rubbing or bruising under heavy loads. Therefore, if comfort is your top priority, the Gregory Maven 48 is the clear winner.
Fit
Osprey Aura AG 65L Women's Backpacking Backpack
Maven 48
A good fit ensures that the backpack sits snugly on your body, distributing weight evenly and reducing strain. The Gregory Maven 48 again takes the lead with a fit score of 4.7/5, thanks to its adjustable torso length and 3D cradle style hip belt, which allows for a dialed-in fit. The Osprey Aura AG 65L, with a fit score of 4.1/5, also offers adjustable features but has some complaints about the fit not being as precise. For those who need a backpack that can be finely tuned to their body, the Gregory Maven 48 is the better choice.
Load Transfer
Osprey Aura AG 65L Women's Backpacking Backpack
Maven 48
Effective load transfer is essential for reducing fatigue and making your hike more enjoyable. The Gregory Maven 48 scores slightly higher in this category with a 4.4/5, thanks to its free float suspension system and hip belt that articulates with your hips, effectively transferring weight to your legs. The Osprey Aura AG 65L, with a score of 4.1/5, also performs well with its anti-gravity suspension system but has some complaints about stability under heavy loads. For better load transfer, the Gregory Maven 48 is the winner.
Ventilation
Osprey Aura AG 65L Women's Backpacking Backpack
Maven 48
Proper ventilation helps keep you cool and dry, which is especially important on long hikes or in warm weather. The Osprey Aura AG 65L excels in this category with a score of 4.6/5, praised for its excellent breathability and mesh back panel that keeps airflow steady. The Gregory Maven 48, with a ventilation score of 4.1/5, has a breathable back system but doesn't quite match the Osprey's ventilation capabilities. If staying cool and dry is a priority, the Osprey Aura AG 65L is the better choice.
Organization
Osprey Aura AG 65L Women's Backpacking Backpack
Maven 48
Good organization helps you keep your gear accessible and well-arranged, making your trip more efficient and enjoyable. The Gregory Maven 48 scores slightly higher with a 4.9/5, thanks to its numerous pockets and compartments, including a floating top lid and side entry points. The Osprey Aura AG 65L, with a score of 4.7/5, also offers excellent organization with multiple access points and a zippered sleeping bag compartment. For superior organization, the Gregory Maven 48 is the winner.
Accessibility
Osprey Aura AG 65L Women's Backpacking Backpack
Maven 48
Easy access to your gear can save time and effort on the trail. The Gregory Maven 48 scores higher in this category with a 4.3/5, thanks to its on-the-go pocket and stretch mesh pocket that allow for quick access to essentials. The Osprey Aura AG 65L, with a score of 3.9/5, also offers good accessibility with hip belt pockets and easy-to-reach side pockets. For better accessibility, the Gregory Maven 48 is the better choice.
Trust & Transparency
- Data-driven rankings from real user reviews
- Affiliate partnerships don't influence our methodology
We may earn commission from links.
Conclusion & Final Verdict:
In conclusion, the Gregory Maven 48 is the better choice for those prioritizing comfort, fit, and organization, making it ideal for shorter hikes or those who value a snug, comfortable fit. On the other hand, the Osprey Aura AG 65L is better suited for longer trips where ventilation and larger capacity are crucial. Your choice should depend on the length of your trips and your personal comfort preferences.
Related Comparisons
Osprey Aura AG 65L Women's Backpacking BackpackvsThe North Face Women’s Terra 55 Backpack
Compare Osprey Aura AG 65L Women's Backpacking Backpack vs The North Face Women’s Terra 55 Backpack for this category.
Osprey Aura AG 65L Women's Backpacking BackpackvsOsprey Aura AG 50L Women's Backpacking Backpack
Compare Osprey Aura AG 65L Women's Backpacking Backpack vs Osprey Aura AG 50L Women's Backpacking Backpack for this category.
Osprey Aura AG 65L Women's Backpacking BackpackvsGregory Maven 58 Women's Backpacking Backpack
Compare Osprey Aura AG 65L Women's Backpacking Backpack vs Gregory Maven 58 Women's Backpacking Backpack for this category.
Osprey Aura AG 65L Women's Backpacking BackpackvsREI Co-op REI Flash 55 Women's Backpacking Backpack
Compare Osprey Aura AG 65L Women's Backpacking Backpack vs REI Co-op REI Flash 55 Women's Backpacking Backpack for this category.

