SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp vs Zpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp
Why You Can Trust Us
- Side-by-side analysis based on real user feedback
- Unbiased comparisons, not influenced by partnerships
- Updated as new data becomes available
We may earn from affiliate links at no extra cost to you.
| SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp | Hexamid Pocket Tarp | |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() VS | |
| Weight | 7.9 oz (without stakes) 10.3 oz (with 6 included DAC j-stakes) | 5.5 oz |
| Dimensions | 8 × 4 × 4 in (packed size) | Exterior:
|
| Material | Fabric: 10D Nylon 66 Ripstop Sil/Sil 1200mm | Dyneema® Composite Fabric |
| Waterproofing | 1200mm (floor) 1800mm (reinforcement fabric) | Waterproof |
| Guy Lines | Front guylines with clips | LineLoc V adjusters |
| Warranty | Not specified | 2 Years |
| Stakes | 6 included DAC j-stakes | 6 to 10 (sold separately) |
| Headroom | Head: 41–47 in | 52 in |
| Number Of D Rings | 9 perimeter stakeout loops | Not specified |
| Number Of Doors | 1 (front opening) | 2 |
| Number Of Poles | Uses trekking poles (not included) | 1 |
| SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp | Zpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp |
|---|---|
![]() | ![]() |
| Weight | |
7.9 oz (without stakes) 10.3 oz (with 6 included DAC j-stakes) | 5.5 oz |
| Dimensions | |
8 × 4 × 4 in (packed size) | Exterior:
|
| Material | |
Fabric: 10D Nylon 66 Ripstop Sil/Sil 1200mm | Dyneema® Composite Fabric |
| Waterproofing | |
1200mm (floor) 1800mm (reinforcement fabric) | Waterproof |
| Guy Lines | |
Front guylines with clips | LineLoc V adjusters |
| Warranty | |
Not specified | 2 Years |
| Stakes | |
6 included DAC j-stakes | 6 to 10 (sold separately) |
| Headroom | |
Head: 41–47 in | 52 in |
| Number Of D Rings | |
9 perimeter stakeout loops | Not specified |
| Number Of Doors | |
1 (front opening) | 2 |
| Number Of Poles | |
Uses trekking poles (not included) | 1 |
Comfort
SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp
Hexamid Pocket Tarp
Comfort is crucial for backpacking tarps as it directly impacts your rest and overall experience on the trail. A more comfortable tarp can make a significant difference during long trips, especially in adverse weather conditions. The SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp excels in this category with its cushy sheltered space and ample headroom, making it feel more spacious and accommodating. Buyers appreciate the huge weight savings and the protection and comfort it offers. On the other hand, the Zpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp, while comfortable, has some complaints about feeling snug and claustrophobic, particularly for taller individuals. The entry height and space inside are praised, but the overall comfort level is slightly lower compared to the SlingFin.
Durability
SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp
Hexamid Pocket Tarp
Durability is essential for backpacking tarps to ensure they can withstand various weather conditions and rough handling over time. Both the SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp and the Zpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp score equally in this category. The SlingFin's premium silicone-coated nylon and resistance to hydrolysis make it a durable choice. Similarly, the Zpacks tarp is reinforced and seam-taped, ensuring it stands the test of time. Both tarps are designed to resist water absorption, making them reliable options for long-term use.
Weather Resistance
SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp
Hexamid Pocket Tarp
Weather resistance is a critical factor for backpacking tarps, as it determines how well you stay protected from the elements. The Zpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp outperforms the SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp in this category. Buyers consistently praise the Zpacks tarp for its superior weather protection, including handling wind, rainstorms, and even lightning storms. It offers full 360-degree protection and is highly waterproof. The SlingFin, while also providing good weather coverage and protection from winds and driving rain, does not match the level of weather resistance offered by the Zpacks.
Packability
SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp
Hexamid Pocket Tarp
Packability is important for backpackers who need to maximize space and minimize weight in their packs. The Zpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp clearly wins in this category. Buyers appreciate its compact size and lightweight, making it easy to pack and carry. The SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp, while lightweight, does not pack as efficiently and takes up more space. This can be a significant consideration for those who prioritize minimalism and efficiency in their gear.
Reliability
SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp
Hexamid Pocket Tarp
Reliability ensures that your tarp will perform consistently and last through multiple trips. The Zpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp edges out the SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp in this category. Buyers highlight that the Zpacks tarp has stood over the rest, keeping them dry and protected from wind and water. The SlingFin, while reliable with its strategically placed reinforcements and pre-installed spare zipper sliders, does not have as many positive mentions for reliability as the Zpacks.
Weight
SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp
Hexamid Pocket Tarp
Weight is a crucial factor for backpackers who need to minimize their load. The Zpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp is the clear winner in this category. Weighing in at just 5.5 ounces, it is one of the lightest tarps available, making it ideal for ultralight backpackers. The SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp, while also lightweight, ranges from 7.9 to 21 ounces, which is heavier compared to the Zpacks. For those who prioritize weight savings above all else, the Zpacks is the better choice.
Trust & Transparency
- Data-driven rankings from real user reviews
- Affiliate partnerships don't influence our methodology
We may earn commission from links.
Conclusion & Final Verdict:
In conclusion, the SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp and the Zpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp each have their strengths and weaknesses. The SlingFin excels in comfort and durability, making it a great choice for those who prioritize spacious shelter and long-term reliability. On the other hand, the Zpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp stands out in weather resistance, packability, and weight, making it ideal for ultralight backpackers who need to minimize their load and maximize efficiency.
Choose the SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp if you value comfort and durability, or opt for the Zpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp if you prioritize weather resistance and ultralight packability.
Related Comparisons
Wise Owl Outfitters TarpvsSlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp
Compare Wise Owl Outfitters Tarp vs SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp for this category.
Wise Owl Outfitters TarpvsZpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp
Compare Wise Owl Outfitters Tarp vs Zpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp for this category.
Sea to Summit Escapist Evo TarpvsSlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp
Compare Sea to Summit Escapist Evo Tarp vs SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp for this category.
Sea to Summit Escapist Evo TarpvsZpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp
Compare Sea to Summit Escapist Evo Tarp vs Zpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp for this category.

