SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp vs Zpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp

Editorial Team
Last modified at July 31, 2026
When it comes to backpacking tarps, the SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp and the Zpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp are two of the most popular options. Both tarps are designed to provide reliable shelter while minimizing weight, but they cater to slightly different needs and preferences.

Why You Can Trust Us

  • Side-by-side analysis based on real user feedback
  • Unbiased comparisons, not influenced by partnerships
  • Updated as new data becomes available

We may earn from affiliate links at no extra cost to you.

SlingFin SplitWing UL TarpZpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp
SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp
Hexamid Pocket Tarp
Weight

7.9 oz (without stakes) 10.3 oz (with 6 included DAC j-stakes)

5.5 oz

Dimensions

8 × 4 × 4 in (packed size)

Exterior:

  • Peak height: 52 in
  • Center width including vestibule: 62 in
  • End width: 36 in
  • Length: 96 in
Material

Fabric: 10D Nylon 66 Ripstop Sil/Sil 1200mm
Reinforcement Fabric: 20D Nylon Ripstop PE 1800mm

Dyneema® Composite Fabric

Waterproofing

1200mm (floor) 1800mm (reinforcement fabric)

Waterproof

Guy Lines

Front guylines with clips

LineLoc V adjusters

Warranty

Not specified

2 Years

Stakes

6 included DAC j-stakes

6 to 10 (sold separately)

Headroom

Head: 41–47 in
ft: 18 in

52 in

Number Of D Rings

9 perimeter stakeout loops

Not specified

Number Of Doors

1 (front opening)

2

Number Of Poles

Uses trekking poles (not included)

1

Comfort

SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp

4.1/ 5.0

Hexamid Pocket Tarp

3.8/ 5.0

Comfort is crucial for backpacking tarps as it directly impacts your rest and overall experience on the trail. A more comfortable tarp can make a significant difference during long trips, especially in adverse weather conditions. The SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp excels in this category with its cushy sheltered space and ample headroom, making it feel more spacious and accommodating. Buyers appreciate the huge weight savings and the protection and comfort it offers. On the other hand, the Zpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp, while comfortable, has some complaints about feeling snug and claustrophobic, particularly for taller individuals. The entry height and space inside are praised, but the overall comfort level is slightly lower compared to the SlingFin.

Durability

SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp

4.1/ 5.0

Hexamid Pocket Tarp

4.1/ 5.0

Durability is essential for backpacking tarps to ensure they can withstand various weather conditions and rough handling over time. Both the SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp and the Zpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp score equally in this category. The SlingFin's premium silicone-coated nylon and resistance to hydrolysis make it a durable choice. Similarly, the Zpacks tarp is reinforced and seam-taped, ensuring it stands the test of time. Both tarps are designed to resist water absorption, making them reliable options for long-term use.

Weather Resistance

SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp

4.1/ 5.0

Hexamid Pocket Tarp

4.4/ 5.0

Weather resistance is a critical factor for backpacking tarps, as it determines how well you stay protected from the elements. The Zpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp outperforms the SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp in this category. Buyers consistently praise the Zpacks tarp for its superior weather protection, including handling wind, rainstorms, and even lightning storms. It offers full 360-degree protection and is highly waterproof. The SlingFin, while also providing good weather coverage and protection from winds and driving rain, does not match the level of weather resistance offered by the Zpacks.

Packability

SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp

3.0/ 5.0

Hexamid Pocket Tarp

4.3/ 5.0

Packability is important for backpackers who need to maximize space and minimize weight in their packs. The Zpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp clearly wins in this category. Buyers appreciate its compact size and lightweight, making it easy to pack and carry. The SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp, while lightweight, does not pack as efficiently and takes up more space. This can be a significant consideration for those who prioritize minimalism and efficiency in their gear.

Reliability

SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp

3.7/ 5.0

Hexamid Pocket Tarp

4.2/ 5.0

Reliability ensures that your tarp will perform consistently and last through multiple trips. The Zpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp edges out the SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp in this category. Buyers highlight that the Zpacks tarp has stood over the rest, keeping them dry and protected from wind and water. The SlingFin, while reliable with its strategically placed reinforcements and pre-installed spare zipper sliders, does not have as many positive mentions for reliability as the Zpacks.

Weight

SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp

4.1/ 5.0

Hexamid Pocket Tarp

4.8/ 5.0

Weight is a crucial factor for backpackers who need to minimize their load. The Zpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp is the clear winner in this category. Weighing in at just 5.5 ounces, it is one of the lightest tarps available, making it ideal for ultralight backpackers. The SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp, while also lightweight, ranges from 7.9 to 21 ounces, which is heavier compared to the Zpacks. For those who prioritize weight savings above all else, the Zpacks is the better choice.

Trust & Transparency

  • Data-driven rankings from real user reviews
  • Affiliate partnerships don't influence our methodology

We may earn commission from links.

Conclusion & Final Verdict:

In conclusion, the SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp and the Zpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp each have their strengths and weaknesses. The SlingFin excels in comfort and durability, making it a great choice for those who prioritize spacious shelter and long-term reliability. On the other hand, the Zpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp stands out in weather resistance, packability, and weight, making it ideal for ultralight backpackers who need to minimize their load and maximize efficiency.

Choose the SlingFin SplitWing UL Tarp if you value comfort and durability, or opt for the Zpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp if you prioritize weather resistance and ultralight packability.

See All Comparisons

Related Comparisons