The North Face Women’s Terra 55 Backpack vs Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack
Why You Can Trust Us
- Side-by-side analysis based on real user feedback
- Unbiased comparisons, not influenced by partnerships
- Updated as new data becomes available
We may earn from affiliate links at no extra cost to you.
| The North Face Women’s Terra 55 Backpack | Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack | |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() VS | |
| Capacity | 55 L | WXS/S: 62 L; WM/L: 65 L |
| Weight | XS/S: 3 lb 9 oz (57 oz) | WXS/S: 4 lb 13 oz; WM/L: 4 lb 14 oz |
| Torso Adjustability | XS/S: 14.6–17.3 in | WXS/S: 13–17 in; WM/L: 16–20 in |
| Hip Belt Size Range | XS/S: 28–38 in | 26" – 41" |
| Hydration Compatibility | Yes (Hydration sleeve) | Internal hydration reservoir sleeve |
| Warranty | Limited lifetime warranty | All Mighty Guarantee |
| Trekking Pole Attachment | Yes (Pole & ice axe attachments) | Dual ice axe loops with bungee tie-offs |
| Rain Cover Compatibility | Compatible; sold separately | Included raincover |
| Side Pockets | Yes (Large front stash pocket) | Large dual-access stretch mesh side water bottle pockets |
| Hip Pockets | Yes (Secure-zip hip belt pockets) | Dual zippered hipbelt pockets |
| Sternum Strap | Yes (with whistle buckle) | Adjustable sternum strap |
| Load Lifters | Yes (Dyno Lift System™) | Yes; adjustable load-lifter straps |
| Sleeping Bag Compartment | No separate compartment; floating lid can store sleeping gear | Zippered sleeping bag compartment with removable divider |
| The North Face Women’s Terra 55 Backpack | Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack |
|---|---|
![]() | ![]() |
| Capacity | |
55 L | WXS/S: 62 L; WM/L: 65 L |
| Weight | |
XS/S: 3 lb 9 oz (57 oz) | WXS/S: 4 lb 13 oz; WM/L: 4 lb 14 oz |
| Torso Adjustability | |
XS/S: 14.6–17.3 in | WXS/S: 13–17 in; WM/L: 16–20 in |
| Hip Belt Size Range | |
XS/S: 28–38 in | 26" – 41" |
| Hydration Compatibility | |
Yes (Hydration sleeve) | Internal hydration reservoir sleeve |
| Warranty | |
Limited lifetime warranty | All Mighty Guarantee |
| Trekking Pole Attachment | |
Yes (Pole & ice axe attachments) | Dual ice axe loops with bungee tie-offs |
| Rain Cover Compatibility | |
Compatible; sold separately | Included raincover |
| Side Pockets | |
Yes (Large front stash pocket) | Large dual-access stretch mesh side water bottle pockets |
| Hip Pockets | |
Yes (Secure-zip hip belt pockets) | Dual zippered hipbelt pockets |
| Sternum Strap | |
Yes (with whistle buckle) | Adjustable sternum strap |
| Load Lifters | |
Yes (Dyno Lift System™) | Yes; adjustable load-lifter straps |
| Sleeping Bag Compartment | |
No separate compartment; floating lid can store sleeping gear | Zippered sleeping bag compartment with removable divider |
Comfort
The North Face Women’s Terra 55 Backpack
Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack
Comfort is crucial for backpacking packs, as it directly impacts your ability to enjoy long hikes without discomfort. A more comfortable pack means less strain on your shoulders and back, allowing you to focus on the trail ahead. The Osprey Ariel 65 excels in this category with its anti-gravity suspension and thick foam padding in the straps and hip belt, providing exceptional comfort. The North Face Terra 55, while comfortable with its padded shoulder straps and back panel, falls slightly short compared to the Ariel 65. The Ariel 65's mesh back panel also enhances ventilation, keeping you cooler during strenuous hikes.
Fit
The North Face Women’s Terra 55 Backpack
Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack
A good fit ensures that the pack moves with your body, reducing the risk of discomfort and injury. The Osprey Ariel 65 offers a customizable fit with adjustable torso length, shoulder straps, and hip belts, making it suitable for a wide range of body shapes and sizes. The North Face Terra 55 also provides a stable fit with its adjustable torso length and hip straps, but it doesn't offer the same level of customization as the Ariel 65. The Ariel 65's adjustable front clip and load adjustment straps further enhance its fit, providing a more tailored experience.
Load Transfer
The North Face Women’s Terra 55 Backpack
Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack
Effective load transfer is essential for reducing shoulder strain and maintaining balance on the trail. The Osprey Ariel 65 excels in this area with its cushioned hip belt and adjustable straps, which shift weight to your legs, reducing shoulder strain. The North Face Terra 55 also performs well with its aluminum frame and hip belt, but it doesn't match the Ariel 65's level of load transfer efficiency. The Ariel 65's load adjustment straps and hip belts ensure that the pack remains stable even during quick movements.
Ventilation
The North Face Women’s Terra 55 Backpack
Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack
Proper ventilation helps keep you cool and dry, which is crucial for comfort during long hikes. The Osprey Ariel 65 stands out with its AirScape back panel and mesh-covered foam, providing excellent ventilation. The North Face Terra 55 offers breathable mesh and ventilation channels, but it doesn't perform as well as the Ariel 65 in keeping your back cool. The Ariel 65's ventilation system is more effective, making it a better choice for hot weather or strenuous hikes.
Organization
The North Face Women’s Terra 55 Backpack
Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack
Good organization features make it easier to access and store gear efficiently, which is crucial for a smooth backpacking experience. The Osprey Ariel 65 excels in this category with its detachable day pack, multiple access points, and dedicated compartments for gear. The North Face Terra 55 offers multiple pockets and compartments, but it doesn't match the Ariel 65's level of organization. The Ariel 65's smart organizational features, such as the U-shaped zipper and zippered sleeping bag compartment, make it easier to pack and find essentials.
Accessibility
The North Face Women’s Terra 55 Backpack
Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack
Easy access to essentials is important for convenience and efficiency on the trail. The Osprey Ariel 65 shines in this area with its L-shaped zipper, side pockets, and hip belt pockets, allowing quick access to snacks, water, or gear. The North Face Terra 55 provides zippered top and side pockets for quick access, but it doesn't offer the same level of accessibility as the Ariel 65. The Ariel 65's easy access features make it a more convenient choice for hikers who need to grab items quickly.
Trust & Transparency
- Data-driven rankings from real user reviews
- Affiliate partnerships don't influence our methodology
We may earn commission from links.
Conclusion & Final Verdict:
After comparing the The North Face Women’s Terra 55 Backpack and the Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack, it's clear that the Osprey Ariel 65 is the superior choice for most backpackers. It excels in comfort, organization, ventilation, and accessibility, making it ideal for long hikes and those who prioritize ease of access. However, if you're looking for a lighter pack and don't need as much capacity, the North Face Terra 55 is a solid option.
Related Comparisons
Osprey Aura AG 65L Women's Backpacking BackpackvsThe North Face Women’s Terra 55 Backpack
Compare Osprey Aura AG 65L Women's Backpacking Backpack vs The North Face Women’s Terra 55 Backpack for this category.
Osprey Aura AG 65L Women's Backpacking BackpackvsOsprey Ariel 65 Backpack
Compare Osprey Aura AG 65L Women's Backpacking Backpack vs Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack for this category.
The North Face Women’s Terra 55 BackpackvsOsprey Aura AG 50L Women's Backpacking Backpack
Compare The North Face Women’s Terra 55 Backpack vs Osprey Aura AG 50L Women's Backpacking Backpack for this category.
The North Face Women’s Terra 55 BackpackvsGregory Maven 58 Women's Backpacking Backpack
Compare The North Face Women’s Terra 55 Backpack vs Gregory Maven 58 Women's Backpacking Backpack for this category.

