Gossamer Gear Twinn Tarp vs Zpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp

Editorial Team
Last modified at July 31, 2026
When it comes to backpacking tarps, the Gossamer Gear Twinn Tarp and the Zpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp are both excellent choices, but they cater to slightly different needs. The Twinn Tarp is known for its spacious design and durability, making it a great option for those who prioritize comfort and robustness. On the other hand, the Hexamid Pocket Tarp is exceptionally lightweight and offers superior weather resistance, ideal for ultralight backpackers who need reliable protection in various conditions.

Why You Can Trust Us

  • Side-by-side analysis based on real user feedback
  • Unbiased comparisons, not influenced by partnerships
  • Updated as new data becomes available

We may earn from affiliate links at no extra cost to you.

Gossamer Gear Twinn TarpZpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp
Twinn Tarp
Hexamid Pocket Tarp
Weight

9.7 oz

5.5 oz

Dimensions

Length of ridgeline: 117 in
Length of wall at ground: 108 in
Tarp area staked down to ground: 47 sq ft
Total width of front of tarp: 116 in
Total width of rear of tarp: 84 in

Exterior:

  • Peak height: 52 in
  • Center width including vestibule: 62 in
  • End width: 36 in
  • Length: 96 in
Material

Fabric: 10D high tenacity nylon with blended silicone/polyurethane coating

Dyneema® Composite Fabric

Waterproofing

HH to 1800mm

Waterproof

Guy Lines

Not specified

LineLoc V adjusters

Warranty

Not specified

2 Years

Stakes

Not specified

6 to 10 (sold separately)

Headroom

Not specified

52 in

Number Of D Rings

Not specified

Not specified

Number Of Doors

Not specified

2

Number Of Poles

2 (trekking poles required)

1

Comfort

Twinn Tarp

3.9/ 5.0

Hexamid Pocket Tarp

3.8/ 5.0

Comfort is crucial for a backpacking tarp as it directly impacts your rest and shelter experience. A more comfortable tarp means better sleep and more enjoyable trips. The Gossamer Gear Twinn Tarp is praised for its roomy design, offering a lot of space which is a significant advantage for taller individuals or those who prefer more room to move around. The Zpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp, while slightly less spacious, still provides enough room for most users and includes features like easy tensioning and roll-up doors that enhance comfort. However, some users find it a bit snug, which might be a consideration for those who prioritize space. Overall, both tarps offer good comfort, but the Twinn Tarp has a slight edge due to its roomier design.

Durability

Twinn Tarp

4.1/ 5.0

Hexamid Pocket Tarp

4.1/ 5.0

Durability ensures your tarp can withstand the rigors of the trail and various weather conditions. A durable tarp will last longer and provide reliable shelter. Both the Gossamer Gear Twinn Tarp and the Zpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp score equally in durability. The Twinn Tarp uses 7D material and is noted for its robust stitching, while the Hexamid Pocket Tarp is reinforced and seam-taped, ensuring it holds up well over time. Both tarps are designed to be long-lasting, making durability a tie between the two.

Weather Resistance

Twinn Tarp

3.6/ 5.0

Hexamid Pocket Tarp

4.4/ 5.0

Weather resistance is a critical factor for any backpacking tarp, as it determines how well you'll be protected from the elements. The Zpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp excels in this category with a higher rating and numerous positive mentions about its ability to handle rain, wind, and storms. Users appreciate its full 360-degree protection and waterproofing. The Gossamer Gear Twinn Tarp, while still offering decent weather resistance, falls short in heavy rain and windy conditions compared to the Hexamid. Therefore, if weather resistance is a top priority, the Hexamid Pocket Tarp is the clear winner.

Packability

Twinn Tarp

4.1/ 5.0

Hexamid Pocket Tarp

4.3/ 5.0

Packability refers to how easily and compactly a tarp can be packed away, which is important for backpackers who need to save space and weight. The Zpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp is slightly more packable, with users praising its compact size and light weight. The Gossamer Gear Twinn Tarp is also easy to pack, with positive feedback on its stuff sack and compressibility. However, the Hexamid's superior packability makes it a better choice for those who prioritize minimalism and space-saving.

Reliability

Twinn Tarp

3.0/ 5.0

Hexamid Pocket Tarp

4.2/ 5.0

Reliability is about how dependable the tarp is in various conditions and over time. A reliable tarp will consistently perform well, keeping you dry and protected. The Zpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp scores higher in reliability, with users highlighting its ability to keep them dry and protect from wind and water. The Gossamer Gear Twinn Tarp has mixed reviews, with some users finding it good enough while others note stability issues. Therefore, the Hexamid Pocket Tarp is the more reliable choice.

Weight

Twinn Tarp

4.4/ 5.0

Hexamid Pocket Tarp

4.8/ 5.0

Weight is a crucial consideration for backpackers, as a lighter tarp can significantly reduce the overall load. The Zpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp is notably lighter, weighing in at 5.5 oz compared to the Twinn Tarp's 9.7 oz. Users consistently praise the Hexamid for its lightweight design, making it an excellent choice for ultralight backpackers. While the Twinn Tarp is also lightweight, the Hexamid's superior weight savings make it the clear winner in this category.

Trust & Transparency

  • Data-driven rankings from real user reviews
  • Affiliate partnerships don't influence our methodology

We may earn commission from links.

Conclusion & Final Verdict:

In conclusion, the Zpacks Hexamid Pocket Tarp is the better choice for ultralight backpackers who prioritize weight savings and superior weather resistance. Its exceptional packability and reliability make it a standout option. However, if you value space and durability, the Gossamer Gear Twinn Tarp is a solid alternative. Choose the Hexamid Pocket Tarp for its lightweight design and excellent weather protection, or opt for the Twinn Tarp if you prefer a roomier and durable shelter.

See All Comparisons

Related Comparisons