Gregory Deva 60 Women's Backpacking Backpack vs Gregory Maven 48
Why You Can Trust Us
- Side-by-side analysis based on real user feedback
- Unbiased comparisons, not influenced by partnerships
- Updated as new data becomes available
We may earn from affiliate links at no extra cost to you.
| Deva 60 Women's Backpacking Backpack | Maven 48 | |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() VS | |
| Capacity | XS: 55 L; S: 60 L; M: 65 L | XS/S: 44 L; S/M: 48 L |
| Weight | 4 lb 9.1 oz | XS/S: 3 lb 1.9 oz; S/M: 3 lb 3.2 oz |
| Torso Adjustability | XS: 14–17 in; S: 15–18 in; M: 16–19 in | XS/S: 14–17 in; S/M: 15–19 in |
| Hip Belt Size Range | XS: 26–48 in; S: 26–48 in; M: 28–50 in | XS/S: 24–46 in; S/M: 25–48 in |
| Hydration Compatibility | Yes | Yes |
| Warranty | Limited Lifetime | Limited Lifetime |
| Trekking Pole Attachment | Yes | Yes |
| Rain Cover Compatibility | Compatible; included status varies by model year | Compatible; not included |
| Side Pockets | Yes | Yes |
| Hip Pockets | Yes | Yes |
| Sternum Strap | Yes | Yes |
| Load Lifters | Yes | Yes |
| Sleeping Bag Compartment | Yes | Yes |
| Gregory Deva 60 Women's Backpacking Backpack | Gregory Maven 48 |
|---|---|
![]() | ![]() |
| Capacity | |
XS: 55 L; S: 60 L; M: 65 L | XS/S: 44 L; S/M: 48 L |
| Weight | |
4 lb 9.1 oz | XS/S: 3 lb 1.9 oz; S/M: 3 lb 3.2 oz |
| Torso Adjustability | |
XS: 14–17 in; S: 15–18 in; M: 16–19 in | XS/S: 14–17 in; S/M: 15–19 in |
| Hip Belt Size Range | |
XS: 26–48 in; S: 26–48 in; M: 28–50 in | XS/S: 24–46 in; S/M: 25–48 in |
| Hydration Compatibility | |
Yes | Yes |
| Warranty | |
Limited Lifetime | Limited Lifetime |
| Trekking Pole Attachment | |
Yes | Yes |
| Rain Cover Compatibility | |
Compatible; included status varies by model year | Compatible; not included |
| Side Pockets | |
Yes | Yes |
| Hip Pockets | |
Yes | Yes |
| Sternum Strap | |
Yes | Yes |
| Load Lifters | |
Yes | Yes |
| Sleeping Bag Compartment | |
Yes | Yes |
Comfort
Deva 60 Women's Backpacking Backpack
Maven 48
Comfort is crucial for backpacking packs, as it directly impacts your enjoyment and endurance on the trail. A more comfortable pack means less strain on your back and shoulders, allowing you to hike longer and with less fatigue. The Gregory Maven 48 excels in this category with its super comfortable back panel and free float suspension system, which reduces potential hot spots and blisters. The Deva 60, while still comfortable, has a slightly lower comfort rating due to a few complaints about pressure points and ventilation. The Maven 48's breathable air cushion mesh back panel and flexible hip belt panels contribute to its higher comfort score, making it the better choice for those prioritizing comfort.
Fit
Deva 60 Women's Backpacking Backpack
Maven 48
A good fit ensures that the pack stays secure and comfortable on your body, reducing the risk of chafing and discomfort. Both the Deva 60 and Maven 48 offer excellent fit options, with adjustable straps and hip belts designed specifically for women. The Deva 60 provides three different sizes and a suspension system that allows for fine-tuning the torso fit, making it highly customizable. The Maven 48 also offers a dialed-in fit with an extendable hip belt and adjustable torso length, ensuring a snug and comfortable fit. Given the close scores and similar praise for adjustability, this category is a tie.
Load Transfer
Deva 60 Women's Backpacking Backpack
Maven 48
Effective load transfer is essential for distributing weight evenly and reducing strain on your back and shoulders. The Maven 48 slightly edges out the Deva 60 in this category with its free float suspension system and hip belt that articulates with your hips, providing better weight distribution and reducing fatigue. The Deva 60 also has strong load transfer capabilities with its response A3 suspension system and adjustable straps, but it falls slightly short compared to the Maven 48. For those carrying heavier loads or planning longer trips, the Maven 48's superior load transfer can make a noticeable difference.
Ventilation
Deva 60 Women's Backpacking Backpack
Maven 48
Proper ventilation helps keep you cool and dry, which is especially important in hotter conditions or during intense physical activity. The Maven 48 has a slight advantage in ventilation with its breathable air cushion mesh back panel, which promotes better airflow and reduces heat buildup. The Deva 60 also features a breathable system and air cushion back panel, but it has a lower ventilation score due to some complaints about heat and moisture. While both packs offer good ventilation, the Maven 48 is the better choice for those who prioritize staying cool and dry.
Organization
Deva 60 Women's Backpacking Backpack
Maven 48
Good organization makes it easier to access your gear quickly and keep everything in its place, which is crucial for efficient backpacking. Both the Deva 60 and Maven 48 excel in organization, with multiple pockets, compartments, and attachment points. The Deva 60 offers smart storage solutions with three entry points and a variety of pockets, making it easy to access your gear. The Maven 48 also provides excellent organization with its on-the-go pocket, stretch mesh pockets, and removable dividers. Given the high scores and similar organizational features, this category is a tie.
Accessibility
Deva 60 Women's Backpacking Backpack
Maven 48
Easy access to your gear can save time and effort on the trail, allowing you to quickly grab what you need without digging through your pack. The Deva 60 excels in accessibility with its angled water bottle holder, easy-to-reach gear, and three entry points to the main body. The Maven 48 also offers good accessibility with its on-the-go pocket and side entry points, but it falls slightly short compared to the Deva 60. For those who value quick and easy access to their gear, the Deva 60 is the better choice.
Trust & Transparency
- Data-driven rankings from real user reviews
- Affiliate partnerships don't influence our methodology
We may earn commission from links.
Conclusion & Final Verdict:
In conclusion, the Gregory Deva 60 and Gregory Maven 48 are both excellent backpacking packs, each with its own strengths. The Deva 60 is ideal for those who need more capacity and better accessibility, making it perfect for longer trips. On the other hand, the Maven 48 excels in comfort and is lighter, making it a great choice for shorter, more comfortable hikes. Depending on your specific needs and preferences, either pack could be the perfect companion for your next adventure.
Related Comparisons
Gregory Deva 60 Women's Backpacking BackpackvsDeuter Aircontact Core 45+10 SL
The Gregory Deva 60 excels in organization and accessibility, ideal for those needing ample storage and easy gear access. The Deuter Aircontact Core 45+10 SL offers better ventilation and load transfer, suited for hotter climates and heavier loads.
Gregory Deva 60 Women's Backpacking BackpackvsOsprey Ariel 65 Backpack
The Gregory Deva 60 excels in comfort and fit, while the Osprey Ariel 65 offers better ventilation and organization. Choose the Deva 60 for a more comfortable and adjustable fit, or the Ariel 65 for superior ventilation and smart storage solutions.
Gregory Maven 48vsDeuter Aircontact Core 45+10 SL
The Gregory Maven 48 excels in comfort and organization, making it ideal for those prioritizing ease of use. The Deuter Aircontact Core 45+10 SL offers better ventilation and a more adjustable fit, suitable for varied torso lengths.
ULA Equipment ULA Circuit BackpackvsOsprey Ariel 65 Backpack
The ULA Circuit excels in load transfer and weight, ideal for long trails, while the Osprey Ariel 65 offers superior comfort and organization, making it perfect for those who prioritize ease of access and ventilation.
ULA Equipment ULA Circuit BackpackvsOsprey Eja 58 Pack - Women's
The ULA Circuit Backpack excels in fit and load transfer, ideal for those prioritizing comfort and weight distribution. The Osprey Eja 58 Pack offers better ventilation, making it a great choice for hot weather.
ULA Equipment ULA Circuit BackpackvsOsprey Eja Pro 55
The ULA Circuit Backpack offers superior organization and a larger capacity, while the Osprey Eja Pro 55 excels in ventilation and accessibility. Choose the ULA Circuit for extensive gear storage and the Osprey Eja Pro for better breathability and easier access to essentials.

