ULA Equipment ULA Circuit Backpack vs Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack
Why You Can Trust Us
- Side-by-side analysis based on real user feedback
- Unbiased comparisons, not influenced by partnerships
- Updated as new data becomes available
We may earn from affiliate links at no extra cost to you.
| ULA Circuit Backpack | Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack | |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() VS | |
| Capacity | 68 L total: 39.3 L main body; 6.6 L front; 6.6 L each side; 8.2 L collar; 1.5 L each hipbelt pocket | WXS/S: 62 L; WM/L: 65 L |
| Weight | 2 lb 6.5 oz (38.5 oz) | WXS/S: 4 lb 13 oz; WM/L: 4 lb 14 oz |
| Torso Adjustability | SMALL: 15–18 in | WXS/S: 13–17 in; WM/L: 16–20 in |
| Hip Belt Size Range | X-SMALL: 26–30 in | 26" – 41" |
| Hydration Compatibility | Yes; hydration port, optional sleeve | Internal hydration reservoir sleeve |
| Warranty | Lifetime (original owner, defects in materials and workmanship) | All Mighty Guarantee |
| Trekking Pole Attachment | Yes (Ice Axe/Trekking Pole Loops) | Dual ice axe loops with bungee tie-offs |
| Rain Cover Compatibility | Compatible; sold separately | Included raincover |
| Side Pockets | Yes (each accommodates two 1-Liter bottles) | Large dual-access stretch mesh side water bottle pockets |
| Hip Pockets | Yes (Dual Hipbelt Pockets) | Dual zippered hipbelt pockets |
| Sternum Strap | Yes (Removable & Height Adjustable) | Adjustable sternum strap |
| Load Lifters | Yes (adjustable) | Yes; adjustable load-lifter straps |
| Sleeping Bag Compartment | No separate compartment; roll-top main body | Zippered sleeping bag compartment with removable divider |
| ULA Equipment ULA Circuit Backpack | Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack |
|---|---|
![]() | ![]() |
| Capacity | |
68 L total: 39.3 L main body; 6.6 L front; 6.6 L each side; 8.2 L collar; 1.5 L each hipbelt pocket | WXS/S: 62 L; WM/L: 65 L |
| Weight | |
2 lb 6.5 oz (38.5 oz) | WXS/S: 4 lb 13 oz; WM/L: 4 lb 14 oz |
| Torso Adjustability | |
SMALL: 15–18 in | WXS/S: 13–17 in; WM/L: 16–20 in |
| Hip Belt Size Range | |
X-SMALL: 26–30 in | 26" – 41" |
| Hydration Compatibility | |
Yes; hydration port, optional sleeve | Internal hydration reservoir sleeve |
| Warranty | |
Lifetime (original owner, defects in materials and workmanship) | All Mighty Guarantee |
| Trekking Pole Attachment | |
Yes (Ice Axe/Trekking Pole Loops) | Dual ice axe loops with bungee tie-offs |
| Rain Cover Compatibility | |
Compatible; sold separately | Included raincover |
| Side Pockets | |
Yes (each accommodates two 1-Liter bottles) | Large dual-access stretch mesh side water bottle pockets |
| Hip Pockets | |
Yes (Dual Hipbelt Pockets) | Dual zippered hipbelt pockets |
| Sternum Strap | |
Yes (Removable & Height Adjustable) | Adjustable sternum strap |
| Load Lifters | |
Yes (adjustable) | Yes; adjustable load-lifter straps |
| Sleeping Bag Compartment | |
No separate compartment; roll-top main body | Zippered sleeping bag compartment with removable divider |
Comfort
ULA Circuit Backpack
Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack
Comfort is crucial for backpacking packs, as it directly impacts your hiking experience, especially on long trails. A comfortable backpack ensures that you can carry your gear without straining your back and shoulders, making your journey more enjoyable. The Osprey Ariel 65 stands out in this category with its anti-gravity suspension, thick foam padding in the straps and hip belt, and a mesh back panel that keeps you cool and dry. The ULA Circuit, while comfortable with its fully padded back panel and shoulder straps, falls short due to complaints about back sweating and ventilation issues. Therefore, if comfort is your top priority, the Osprey Ariel 65 is the better choice.
Fit
ULA Circuit Backpack
Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack
A good fit is essential for stability and balance, ensuring that the backpack moves with your body and doesn't cause discomfort. Both the ULA Circuit and the Osprey Ariel 65 offer adjustable shoulder straps and hip belts, catering to a wide range of body shapes and sizes. The ULA Circuit provides multiple sizing options and a height-adjustable hip belt, while the Osprey Ariel 65 offers a customizable fit with adjustable torso length and shoulder straps. Given the similar high ratings and positive feedback for both, the fit category is a tie.
Load Transfer
ULA Circuit Backpack
Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack
Effective load transfer is vital for reducing strain on your shoulders and back, allowing you to carry heavier loads more comfortably. The ULA Circuit excels in this category with its four-point contact hip belt system and load lifters, which spread the weight effectively and reduce shoulder strain. The Osprey Ariel 65 also performs well with its cushioned hip belt and adjustable straps, but it doesn't quite match the ULA Circuit's efficiency in load transfer. If you plan to carry heavy loads, the ULA Circuit is the better option.
Ventilation
ULA Circuit Backpack
Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack
Proper ventilation helps keep your back cool and dry, enhancing your overall comfort during strenuous hikes. The Osprey Ariel 65 shines in this category with its AirScape back panel and mesh-covered foam, providing excellent airflow and breathability. The ULA Circuit, on the other hand, has ventilation issues with complaints about back sweating, making it less ideal for hot and humid conditions. If ventilation is a priority, the Osprey Ariel 65 is the clear winner.
Organization
ULA Circuit Backpack
Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack
Good organization in a backpacking pack means you can easily access and store your gear, making your hike more efficient and enjoyable. The Osprey Ariel 65 stands out with its smart organizational features, including a detachable day pack, multiple access points, and dedicated compartments for gear. The ULA Circuit also offers good organization with removable straps and pockets, but it doesn't match the Ariel 65's level of convenience and accessibility. For those who value organization and easy access to their gear, the Osprey Ariel 65 is the better choice.
Accessibility
ULA Circuit Backpack
Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack
Easy access to your gear can make a significant difference in your hiking experience, allowing you to quickly grab essentials without slowing down. The Osprey Ariel 65 excels in accessibility with its L-shaped zipper, side pockets, and hip belt pockets, making it easy to reach your gear on the go. The ULA Circuit offers side pouches and pockets, but it doesn't provide the same level of quick access as the Ariel 65. If accessibility is important to you, the Osprey Ariel 65 is the clear winner.
Trust & Transparency
- Data-driven rankings from real user reviews
- Affiliate partnerships don't influence our methodology
We may earn commission from links.
Conclusion & Final Verdict:
After comparing the ULA Circuit Backpack and the Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack, it's clear that each has its strengths and weaknesses. The ULA Circuit is the better choice for those who prioritize load transfer and weight, making it ideal for long trails and heavy loads. On the other hand, the Osprey Ariel 65 excels in comfort, organization, and accessibility, making it perfect for those who value ease of access and ventilation.
Choose the ULA Circuit if you need a lightweight pack with excellent load transfer for long hikes. Opt for the Osprey Ariel 65 if you prefer a comfortable, well-organized pack with easy access to your gear.
Related Comparisons
Osprey Aura AG 65L Women's Backpacking BackpackvsULA Equipment ULA Circuit Backpack
Compare Osprey Aura AG 65L Women's Backpacking Backpack vs ULA Equipment ULA Circuit Backpack for this category.
Osprey Aura AG 65L Women's Backpacking BackpackvsOsprey Ariel 65 Backpack
Compare Osprey Aura AG 65L Women's Backpacking Backpack vs Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack for this category.
The North Face Women’s Terra 55 BackpackvsULA Equipment ULA Circuit Backpack
Compare The North Face Women’s Terra 55 Backpack vs ULA Equipment ULA Circuit Backpack for this category.
The North Face Women’s Terra 55 BackpackvsOsprey Ariel 65 Backpack
Compare The North Face Women’s Terra 55 Backpack vs Osprey Ariel 65 Backpack for this category.

