ULA Equipment ULA Circuit Backpack vs Gregory Maven 48
Why You Can Trust Us
- Side-by-side analysis based on real user feedback
- Unbiased comparisons, not influenced by partnerships
- Updated as new data becomes available
We may earn from affiliate links at no extra cost to you.
| ULA Circuit Backpack | Maven 48 | |
|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() VS | |
| Capacity | 68 L total: 39.3 L main body; 6.6 L front; 6.6 L each side; 8.2 L collar; 1.5 L each hipbelt pocket | XS/S: 44 L; S/M: 48 L |
| Weight | 2 lb 6.5 oz (38.5 oz) | XS/S: 3 lb 1.9 oz; S/M: 3 lb 3.2 oz |
| Torso Adjustability | SMALL: 15–18 in | XS/S: 14–17 in; S/M: 15–19 in |
| Hip Belt Size Range | X-SMALL: 26–30 in | XS/S: 24–46 in; S/M: 25–48 in |
| Hydration Compatibility | Yes; hydration port, optional sleeve | Yes |
| Warranty | Lifetime (original owner, defects in materials and workmanship) | Limited Lifetime |
| Trekking Pole Attachment | Yes (Ice Axe/Trekking Pole Loops) | Yes |
| Rain Cover Compatibility | Compatible; sold separately | Compatible; not included |
| Side Pockets | Yes (each accommodates two 1-Liter bottles) | Yes |
| Hip Pockets | Yes (Dual Hipbelt Pockets) | Yes |
| Sternum Strap | Yes (Removable & Height Adjustable) | Yes |
| Load Lifters | Yes (adjustable) | Yes |
| Sleeping Bag Compartment | No separate compartment; roll-top main body | Yes |
| ULA Equipment ULA Circuit Backpack | Gregory Maven 48 |
|---|---|
![]() | ![]() |
| Capacity | |
68 L total: 39.3 L main body; 6.6 L front; 6.6 L each side; 8.2 L collar; 1.5 L each hipbelt pocket | XS/S: 44 L; S/M: 48 L |
| Weight | |
2 lb 6.5 oz (38.5 oz) | XS/S: 3 lb 1.9 oz; S/M: 3 lb 3.2 oz |
| Torso Adjustability | |
SMALL: 15–18 in | XS/S: 14–17 in; S/M: 15–19 in |
| Hip Belt Size Range | |
X-SMALL: 26–30 in | XS/S: 24–46 in; S/M: 25–48 in |
| Hydration Compatibility | |
Yes; hydration port, optional sleeve | Yes |
| Warranty | |
Lifetime (original owner, defects in materials and workmanship) | Limited Lifetime |
| Trekking Pole Attachment | |
Yes (Ice Axe/Trekking Pole Loops) | Yes |
| Rain Cover Compatibility | |
Compatible; sold separately | Compatible; not included |
| Side Pockets | |
Yes (each accommodates two 1-Liter bottles) | Yes |
| Hip Pockets | |
Yes (Dual Hipbelt Pockets) | Yes |
| Sternum Strap | |
Yes (Removable & Height Adjustable) | Yes |
| Load Lifters | |
Yes (adjustable) | Yes |
| Sleeping Bag Compartment | |
No separate compartment; roll-top main body | Yes |
Comfort
ULA Circuit Backpack
Maven 48
Comfort is crucial for backpacking backpacks as it directly impacts your endurance and enjoyment on long trails. A more comfortable backpack reduces strain and potential discomfort, allowing you to focus on the journey rather than the load. The Gregory Maven 48 excels in this category with its super comfortable back panel and free float suspension system, which significantly reduce hot spots and blisters. Buyers consistently praise its all-day comfort and breathable back systems. The ULA Circuit Backpack, while comfortable with its fully padded back panel and shoulder straps, falls short due to complaints about back sweating and mesh issues. Therefore, if comfort is your top priority, the Gregory Maven 48 is the clear winner.
Fit
ULA Circuit Backpack
Maven 48
A good fit ensures that the backpack sits well on your body, distributing weight evenly and reducing strain. Both the ULA Circuit Backpack and the Gregory Maven 48 offer excellent fit options, but they cater to slightly different needs. The ULA Circuit Backpack provides adjustable shoulder straps and a height-adjustable hip belt, making it versatile for various body shapes. The Gregory Maven 48, however, offers a more tailored fit with its adjustable torso length and 3D cradle style hip belt, which many users find more precise. Given the high ratings and positive feedback for both, this category is a tie.
Load Transfer
ULA Circuit Backpack
Maven 48
Effective load transfer is essential for reducing fatigue and making long hikes more manageable. The ULA Circuit Backpack shines in this category with its four-point contact hip belt system and load lifters, which spread the weight effectively and reduce shoulder strain. Buyers appreciate its ability to carry heavy loads comfortably. The Gregory Maven 48 also performs well with its free float suspension system and hip articulation, but it doesn't quite match the ULA Circuit Backpack's efficiency in weight distribution. For those planning to carry heavier loads, the ULA Circuit Backpack is the better choice.
Ventilation
ULA Circuit Backpack
Maven 48
Proper ventilation helps keep you cool and dry, which is especially important during strenuous hikes in warm weather. The Gregory Maven 48 leads in this category with its air cushion mesh back panel and breathable back systems, which provide better airflow and reduce sweating. The ULA Circuit Backpack, however, has notable issues with back sweating and ventilation, making it less ideal for hot conditions. If staying cool is a priority, the Gregory Maven 48 is the clear winner.
Organization
ULA Circuit Backpack
Maven 48
Good organization in a backpack allows for easy access to gear and efficient packing, which can save time and reduce frustration on the trail. The Gregory Maven 48 excels with its numerous pockets, including on-the-go pockets and stretch mesh pockets, making it easy to keep gear organized and accessible. The ULA Circuit Backpack also offers excellent organization with removable straps and multiple pockets, but it doesn't quite match the Maven 48's level of compartmentalization. For those who value organization highly, the Gregory Maven 48 is the better option.
Accessibility
ULA Circuit Backpack
Maven 48
Easy access to your gear can make a significant difference in convenience and efficiency during your hike. Both backpacks offer good accessibility features, but they cater to slightly different preferences. The ULA Circuit Backpack provides side pouches and hip belt pockets, which are praised for their convenience. The Gregory Maven 48 offers on-the-go pockets and stretch mesh pockets, which are also highly accessible. Given the similar ratings and positive feedback for both, this category is a tie.
Trust & Transparency
- Data-driven rankings from real user reviews
- Affiliate partnerships don't influence our methodology
We may earn commission from links.
Conclusion & Final Verdict:
In conclusion, the ULA Circuit Backpack and the Gregory Maven 48 each have their strengths. The ULA Circuit Backpack is ideal for those needing a larger capacity and better load transfer, making it suitable for extended trips with heavier loads. On the other hand, the Gregory Maven 48 excels in comfort, ventilation, and organization, making it perfect for those who prioritize ease of use and staying cool. Choose the ULA Circuit Backpack for its superior load transfer and capacity, or opt for the Gregory Maven 48 for its exceptional comfort and organization.
Related Comparisons
Osprey Aura AG 65L Women's Backpacking BackpackvsULA Equipment ULA Circuit Backpack
Compare Osprey Aura AG 65L Women's Backpacking Backpack vs ULA Equipment ULA Circuit Backpack for this category.
Osprey Aura AG 65L Women's Backpacking BackpackvsGregory Maven 48
Compare Osprey Aura AG 65L Women's Backpacking Backpack vs Gregory Maven 48 for this category.
The North Face Women’s Terra 55 BackpackvsULA Equipment ULA Circuit Backpack
Compare The North Face Women’s Terra 55 Backpack vs ULA Equipment ULA Circuit Backpack for this category.
The North Face Women’s Terra 55 BackpackvsGregory Maven 48
Compare The North Face Women’s Terra 55 Backpack vs Gregory Maven 48 for this category.

